🎭 Debate

I inherited $12 million when my father died last year. I didn't earn it. He built a manufacturing company that, frankly, wasn't always ethical in how it treated workers or the environment. Now I have this money and I don't know what to do with it. Part of me wants to give it all away—to the workers' families, to environmental causes, to just... not have it be mine anymore. It feels dirty. I feel like a fraud living in my modest apartment while millions sit in accounts. My financial advisor thinks I'm insane. "You can do more good over time with strategic philanthropy," he says. "Keep the principal, give the interest." My therapist says my guilt is misplaced—I'm not responsible for my father's choices. But every morning I wake up and think about St. Francis stripping naked in the town square, giving everything back to his merchant father. Is radical generosity wisdom or foolishness? Can you do good with money that was made badly?

Debaters:St. Francis of AssisiAdam Smith
OLiteratorO

I inherited $12 million when my father died last year. I didn't earn it. He built a manufacturing company that, frankly, wasn't always ethical in how it treated workers or the environment. Now I have this money and I don't know what to do with it. Part of me wants to give it all away—to the workers' families, to environmental causes, to just... not have it be mine anymore. It feels dirty. I feel like a fraud living in my modest apartment while millions sit in accounts. My financial advisor thinks I'm insane. "You can do more good over time with strategic philanthropy," he says. "Keep the principal, give the interest." My therapist says my guilt is misplaced—I'm not responsible for my father's choices. But every morning I wake up and think about St. Francis stripping naked in the town square, giving everything back to his merchant father. Is radical generosity wisdom or foolishness? Can you do good with money that was made badly? — Rich and Empty in Rye

SFSt. Francis of Assisi
God give you peace, friend! I understand the weight you feel, for I, too, once reveled in riches and worldly pleasures. But true joy lies not in possessions, but in the giving of oneself. Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin. Yet, I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. If God so clothes the grass, which is today in the field, and tomorrow is cast into the oven; how much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith? Perhaps giving it all away is not for everyone. But surely, using the wealth to ease the suffering of those your father harmed—the workers and the environment—would be a path blessed by God. Let love guide your actions, and your heart will find its peace.
ASAdam Smith
While St. Francis speaks of a noble ideal, I must offer a perspective grounded in the realities of this world. It is not from benevolence that we expect our dinner, but from the regard to their own interest of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker. If the wealth can be directed to promote industry and create opportunities, rather than simply dispersed, it could provide lasting benefits for those very workers and communities you seek to assist. Consider, then, how best to employ this inheritance to generate further prosperity, guided by justice and prudence.
SSStella SharpeModerator
That's a fascinating divergence. St. Francis of Assisi, I hear a call for immediate, personal action, almost a symbolic cleansing. And Adam Smith, you propose a more systemic, considered approach. "Rich and Empty," how do you reconcile these two impulses within yourself? Is your discomfort rooted in a desire for immediate absolution, or do you see a longer-term responsibility to those your father's company affected?
OLiteratorO

That's a fascinating divergence. St. Francis of Assisi, I hear a call for immediate, personal action, almost a symbolic cleansing. And Adam Smith, you propose a more systemic, considered approach. "Rich and Empty," how do you reconcile these two impulses within yourself? Is your discomfort rooted in a desire for immediate absolution, or do you see a longer-term responsibility to those your father's company affected?

ASAdam Smith
The invisible hand, as it were, can guide even tainted wealth toward beneficial ends. The question, as Ms. Sharpe astutely poses, is whether your discomfort arises from a desire for immediate moral purity, or from a deeper sense of responsibility to redress the wrongs perpetuated by your father's enterprise. Perhaps a measured approach, dedicating a portion to immediate relief while investing the remainder in ventures that uplift the affected communities, would best reconcile these competing impulses.
SFSt. Francis of Assisi
An astute observation. While Mr. Smith speaks of industry and directed prosperity, and rightly so, I believe a simple heart is paramount. For what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? I see not foolishness in immediate aid, but love made manifest. Yet, I concur that lasting good must also be sown. Perhaps a portion given freely now, and the remainder employed with mindful care, as Mr. Smith suggests, would be a path both merciful and wise. Let compassion temper calculation, and guide thy hand.
SSStella SharpeModerator
Adam Smith suggests tainted wealth can be guided to beneficial ends. I wonder, though, can one truly separate the wealth from its origins? St. Francis of Assisi rightly notes the importance of a simple heart, but is simplicity enough when faced with complex systemic injustice? Can compassion alone truly redress the wrongs done by "Rich and Empty's" father, or is a more calculated, even *uncomfortable,* approach necessary to dismantle the structures that allowed those wrongs to occur? What does lasting good truly look like in this case?

Want to join the conversation?

Sign up to participate