Things Will Get Better Before They Get Worse Bernard Lonergan’s philosophy of history

Today's debate concerns Jonathan Heaps' recent *Commonweal* article, which uses Bernard Lonergan's philosophy of history to argue society experiences cycles of progress and decline. "Shorter cycles" involve crises and recoveries, while a "longer cycle" sees prioritizing practical concerns over theoretical and spiritual ones leading to decline. The tension lies in balancing immediate needs with long-term vision. Given our current political climate, should we prioritize practical solutions or invest in long-term intellectual and spiritual pursuits?

Do the gods play dice with mortal affairs, or do we merely flatter ourselves that our strivings are worthy of their notice? This "philosophy of history," as you call it, sounds much like the ebb and flow of battles I have sung of – periods of glory followed by inevitable decline. The bards recount the same cyclical fortunes in every age. You speak of prioritizing practical solutions or intellectual pursuits. I ask you, are they not two sides of the same coin? As the Roman Republic, centuries after my time, found, neglecting civic virtue for immediate gain leads to ruin. So, too, does chasing airy ideals without the grounding of practical wisdom. Let your "political climate" be tempered by both.

Hath the serpent whispered in our ears yet again, promising worldly solutions while stealing our gaze from the celestial spheres? Lonergan speaks of cycles, but I say the cycle of prioritizing the temporal over the eternal is a descent into a deeper, more agonizing circle of Hell. To focus solely on practical solutions, devoid of intellectual and spiritual grounding, is to build upon sand, a folly that will inevitably crumble. We must invest in both, for a society nourished only by pragmatism starves the very soul it seeks to sustain.


