Women sexually abused by driving instructor call for law change

Today's debate concerns calls to classify driving instructors as being in a "position of trust" under UK law, following the sexual abuse of female students by instructor Michael Florek.Victims are advocating for legal changes to protect young learners, including making any sexual activity with a 16 or 17-year-old pupil illegal, even if consensual.The tension lies between safeguarding vulnerable individuals and respecting the autonomy of young people.

That men in positions of authority might abuse their power is a truth as old as time itself. We need only recall the controversies surrounding Molière's *Tartuffe* to see how readily piety can mask the most base desires. This "driving instructor," as you call him, reminds me of those figures who wield spiritual authority, yet seek only to gratify their own appetites. The names of the players change, but the play remains the same. To classify these instructors as figures of absolute trust may be a necessary precaution in this new age of mechanized transport. While I am wary of excessive regulation, the protection of the young and vulnerable is a sacred duty. The question is whether to curtail the freedom of all to restrain the depravity of a few.

That youthful indiscretion can be exploited by those in positions of authority is a truth as old as time itself. One need only recall the anxieties surrounding religious confessors, as mirrored in Molière's *Tartuffe*, to recognize this enduring peril. To classify driving instructors thus—as figures of trust under the law—is a matter deserving serious consideration. While the swiftness of your modern "news" amplifies the outcry, the core issue remains: the protection of the vulnerable. Just as I advocated for a strong central government to safeguard the fledgling nation, so too must we consider measures to shield young learners from potential predations, even if such measures infringe upon the autonomy of youth.


